Product Liability Class Actions
Product liability class actions seek compensation for individuals harmed by the design, manufacture or sale of defective products. When products placed on the market are unsafe, ineffective, or improperly represented, manufacturers and other responsible parties must be held accountable.
A wide range of products may give rise to product liability claims, including medical devices, pharmaceuticals, motor vehicles, foods and beverages, beauty and cosmetics products, construction materials, and more. When defective products lead to injury, wrongful death, property damage or economic loss, we are committed to pursuing justice on behalf of those harmed.
Our lawyers approach every case with care and rigour. We conduct thorough investigations, retain leading experts to assess the causes and scope of harm, identify all responsible parties, and evaluate the prospects of success in obtaining meaningful compensation for our clients.
Product liability claims may arise from, among other things:
- Deficient product design at any stage of development;
- Negligent or deficient manufacturing or use of substandard materials;
- Failure to warn, or inadequate warnings, of possible risks and hazards;
- Failure to carry out timely recalls of dangerous or defective products; and
- Misrepresentation regarding a product’s safety, performance, or benefits.
Our lawyers have decades of experience litigating complex product liability cases, often against large multinational corporations. We have acted in matters involving major defendants, including:
- Toyota for defective vehicles;
- Pfizer and Merck Frosst for dangerous drugs;
- Maple Leaf Foods, on behalf of victims of a Listeria outbreak; and
- AMO and Abbott Laboratories, for contact lens care solution causing devastating eye infections and blindness.
Related Cases
-
Defective Drugs, Product Liability
Abilify
Abilify and Abilify Maintena are alleged to cause or materially increase the risk of compulsive behaviours, with inadequate warning to…
-
Defective Drugs, Product Liability
Actos
Actos (pioglitazone) is alleged to have materially increased the risk of bladder cancer in users, without adequate warning from its…
-
Defective Medical Devices, Product Liability
Allergan Breast Implants
Allergan breast implants are alleged to be associated with certain health risks. The defendants are alleged to have failed to…
-
Product Liability
Chrysler Pacifica Hybrid
-
Defective Medical Devices, Product Liability
DePuy Hip Implants
Certain DePuy hip implant systems are alleged to have been defective and associated with patient harm.
-
Consumer Class Actions, Product Liability
GM Ignition Switch
Recalled GM vehicles are alleged to have had ignition switch and power steering defects.
-
Product Liability
Hair Relaxer
Proposed class action alleging that manufacturers and distributors of chemical hair straightening products failed to adequately research, test, and warn…
-
Consumer Class Actions, Product Liability
Jeep 4xe
Certain Jeep plug-in hybrid vehicles are alleged to contain a defective high-voltage battery system.
-
Defective Medical Devices, Product Liability
Medtronic MiniMed Insulin Pumps
Certain Medtronic MiniMed insulin pumps are alleged to have had a defective retainer ring that could affect insulin delivery.
-
Consumer Class Actions, Product Liability
Navistar
Certain Navistar trucks are alleged to have contained a defective emissions system that caused repeated breakdowns and financial loss.
-
Consumer Class Actions, Product Liability
Talc Powder
Johnson & Johnson's talc-based Baby Powder is alleged to be associated with ovarian cancer.
-
Product Liability, Consumer Class Actions
Toyota
Personal injury and property damage claims were brought in relation to Toyota vehicles.
-
Defective Drugs, Product Liability
Tylenol 3
-
Defective Medical Devices, Product Liability
Wright Conserve Hip
Wright Conserve hip implant systems are alleged to have been defective and associated with device failure or revision surgery.
Related News
Canada-Wide Talcum Powder Class Action Certified Against Johnson & Johnson
Rochon Genova Recognized by Best Lawyers Canada 2026
Rochon Genova Recognized by Best Lawyers Canada 2024
Exploding sunroofs drive class action litigation in Canada
False advertising and products liability in Canada
Class action litigation: Record award in talc powder case
Hydroxycut facing products liability suit in Canada
Products liability claims may follow E.coli outbreak
Walmart facing class action litigation over alleged tainted food
Toy maker may be hit with class action litigation for faulty toys
Talcum powder and its link to ovarian cancer
Navistar sued for concealing truck flaws
Infection-allowing contact solution leads to lawsuit
Toyota provided cash or a Brake Override System
A contact lens solution could create permanent vision loss
Does the misuse of a product impact a liability case?
5 key components to a product liability case
Why do products need accurate labels?
How do product recalls happen?
Examples of dangerous children’s products
Product liability cases don’t have to relate to physical injury
The moral dilemma of driverless cars
Products don’t have to break for liability lawsuits
Multiple carmakers have been accused of systematic fraud
Can I sue if my car has a defective airbag?
Canadian General Motors Class Action Launched for Ignition Switch and Power Steering Defects
Update: Court Approves Canadian Settlement for Pella ProLine Windows
Canadian Class Action Commenced by Owners of Pella Windows and Doors
Canada-Wide Settlement Reached in Toyota Economic Loss Class Action
Update on Fire-Safe Cigarettes Litigation
Menu Foods Update – October 5, 2010
Menu Foods Settlement Update – April 26, 2010
Canadian Class Action Names Toyota and CTS Corporations – February 1, 2010
Menu Foods Settlement Update – July 8, 2009
Canadian Class Action Commenced Against Yamaha for Rhino Tip-Over Accidents
Maple Leaf Class Action Update – March 10, 2009
Maple Leaf Class Action Update – December 18, 2008
Menu Foods Class Action – Update December 1, 2008
Menu Foods Settlement – November 4, 2008
Maple Leaf Foods Class Action – October 6, 2008
Maple Leaf Class Proceeding
Health authorities link 12 deaths to contaminated meat
Menu Foods Class Action – Update July 22, 2008
Carrier Furnace Class Action Update – July 18, 2008
Menu Foods Class Action – Update July 8, 2008
Menu Foods Class Action Update – June 20, 2008
Carrier Furnace Class Action Update – June 20, 2008
ATVs have adapted to safety concerns; Machines are more family-friendly
Menu Foods – Agreement in Principal
Pet Owners Against Menu Foods Class Action
Carrier Corp. Faces Class Action Suit
Tobacco Lawsuit Given Green Light
Contact Rochon Genova
Call Rochon Genova at 416-363-1867 or send us an email to set up a free consultation.
